Former Formula 1 driver and pundit Johnny Herbert has spoken out about his unexpected dismissal from his role as an FIA steward, alleging that outside influences—particularly from the Verstappen camp—played a role in the decision. His removal came just before the start of the 2024 season, a year marked by intense rivalry in the championship.
Allegations of Bias Amid a Heated Title Fight
The 2024 Formula 1 season was defined by a fierce battle for the championship, with Britain’s Lando Norris and Dutch driver Max Verstappen at the center of the action. Herbert, known for his outspoken support of British drivers, found himself facing accusations of bias, particularly from Verstappen’s supporters.
The controversy reached new heights following the Mexican Grand Prix when Herbert publicly criticized Verstappen’s aggressive racing tactics. Calling his approach “harsh” and driven by a “horrible mindset,” Herbert’s comments ignited backlash from Verstappen’s camp, with claims that his judgments were not impartial.
The FIA’s Sudden Decision
Despite assurances that he would continue in his role, Herbert was abruptly informed of his dismissal just days before the season-opening Australian Grand Prix. The former driver admitted he was caught off guard by the decision and suggested that external “chitter chatter” had influenced the FIA’s stance.
While he refrained from naming individuals, Herbert hinted that some had lobbied the FIA President directly, leading to his removal. He expressed frustration, believing that his opinions as a pundit were used against him in a way that ultimately cost him his stewarding role.
Defending His Right to Support British Drivers
In response to the accusations of bias, Herbert dismissed the claims as “ridiculous” and questioned why his support for British drivers was seen as problematic when other figures in the sport openly back their own countrymen.
This debate sparked wider discussions about national allegiances in Formula 1 and whether they should be considered a conflict of interest in roles such as stewarding. Herbert maintained that his expertise and experience allowed him to remain professional, regardless of his personal views.
The Push for Professional Stewards
Herbert’s dismissal has reignited discussions about the FIA’s stewarding system, with calls for more professionalism in the selection process. McLaren CEO Zak Brown has been particularly vocal, arguing that stewards should be full-time, paid officials rather than part-time volunteers.
Brown believes that relying on unpaid and occasionally rotating stewards introduces inconsistency and potential conflicts of interest. He suggested that Formula 1, as a multi-billion-dollar sport, should not be relying on an outdated system for crucial race decisions.
The Bigger Picture for Formula 1 Governance
Herbert’s case highlights broader concerns about governance in Formula 1. The influence of teams, drivers, and their respective fan bases on FIA decisions raises questions about transparency and fairness in stewarding. Ensuring that race officials can operate without external pressures is crucial for the credibility of the sport.
As Formula 1 continues to grow, the debate over how stewarding decisions are made—and who is responsible for them—will likely remain a key topic. Herbert’s dismissal may have been a short-term controversy, but it has brought long-term issues into the spotlight.
In the end, his departure serves as a reminder of the complex power dynamics at play in Formula 1, where media narratives, fan influence, and internal politics can shape the decisions made at the highest level of the sport.